About / Organ Donation / Religious Considerations
Religious beliefs are often an important consideration for those contemplating organ, eye, and tissue donation or transplantation. The following is a summary concerning the various religious groups’ position on organ, eye, and tissue donation and transplantation to assist families in their decision.
However, nothing in the Amish understanding of the Bible forbids them from using modern medical services, including surgery, hospitalization, dental work, anesthesia, blood transfusions or immunizations.
However, the nation’s largest protestant denomination, the Southern Baptist Convention, adopted a resolution in 1988 encouraging physicians to offer the option of organ donation in appropriate circumstances and to “…encourage voluntarism regarding organ donations in the spirit of stewardship, compassion for the needs of others and alleviating suffering.”
Other Baptist groups have supported organ, eye, and tissue donation as an act of charity and leave the decision to donate up to the individual.
Transplants are morally and ethically acceptable to the Vatican. According to Father Leroy Wickowski, Director of the Office of Health Affairs of the Archdiocese of Chicago, “we encourage donation as an act of charity. It is something good that can result from tragedy and a way for families to find comfort by helping others.”
Pope John Paul II has stated, “the Catholic Church would promote the fact that there is a need for organ donors and that Christians should accept this as a challenge to their generosity and fraternal love, so long as ethical principles are followed.”
H.L. Trivedi, in Transplantation Proceedings (1990), stated that, “Hindu mythology has stories in which the parts of the human body are used for the benefit of other humans and society. There is nothing in the Hindu religion indicating that parts of humans, dead or alive, cannot be used to alleviate the suffering of other humans.”
According to Orthodox Rabbi Moses Tendler, Chairman of the Biology Department of Yeshiva University in New York City and Chairman of the Bioethics Commission of the Rabbinical Council of America, “if one is in the position to donate an organ to save another’s life, its obligatory to do so, even if the donor never knows who the beneficiary will be. The basic principle of Jewish ethics is the infinite worth of the human being and also includes donation of corneas, since eyesight restoration is considered a life-saving operation.”
In 1991 the Rabbinical Council of America (Orthodox) approved organ donations as permissible, and even required, from brain-dead patients. The Reform movement looks on the transplant program favorably, and Rabbi Richard Address, Director of the Union of American Hebrew Congregations Bio-Ethics Committee and Committee on Older Adults, states that “Judaic Responsa materials provide a positive approach, and by and large the North American Reform Jewish community approves of transplantation.”
Donation and transplantation are strongly encouraged by Seventh-day Adventists. They have many transplant hospitals, including Loma Linda Hospital in California, which specializes in pediatric heart transplantation.
The General Synod has never spoken to this issue because, in general, the Synod speaks on more controversial issues, and there is no controversy about organ sharing, just as there is no controversy about blood donation in the denomination. While the General Synod has never spoken about blood donation, blood donation rooms have been set up at several General Synods.
Similarly, any organized effort to get the General Synod delegates or individual churches to sign organ donation cards would meet with generally positive responses.”[/toggle]
In it, they state that, “the United Methodist Church recognizes the life-giving benefits of organ, eye, and tissue donation, and thereby encourages all Christians to become organ, eye, and tissue donors by signing and carrying cards or driver’s licenses, attesting to their commitment of such organs upon their death, to those in need, as a part of their ministry to others in the name of Christ, who gave his life that we might have life in its fullness.”
A 1992 resolution states, “donation is to be encouraged, assuming appropriate safeguards against hastening death and determination of death by reliable criteria.” The resolution further states, “pastoral-care persons should be willing to explore these options as a normal part of conversation with patients and their families.”
This section reprinted by permission of James Redford Institute for Transplant Awareness
